I think you should try out software and decide for yourself and ask for help with certain issues you have on the demos before making a decision. Anway, if Reason doesn't mesh with me no harm, I'll rewatch some vids and demo the next one. I know that's logic counter to normal musical peoples, but I'm thinking ahead about where do I want resources to go. Reason has so much built-in that I don't need to worry about always buying more stuff. I've been bouncing around Ableton, Sonar, and Reaper, and my Sweetwater catalog kept staring at me. I woke up this morning thinking about Reason and am going to try that demo first. Since I'm mainly doing music for fun, I'm conscious of the cost and want to fully exploit any discount I can. ![]() ![]() *sarcasm* *well, with reality mixed in* *try making a couple jazz albums* I have an Allen and Heath USB mixer for inteface which is a great buy if you ever need a super clean USB interface. I'll record, produce, mix, and master then, like most musicians, make stuff few people will buy or care about. Adding in some extras, production with Caustic, MIDI, etc. Greg, and others, I'll be doing mostly recording with a mic-guitar, vocals, etc. I would say Ableton is the most versatile program at the moment for both production and live performance.Ĭheck out the you tube vids of what can be done with it, pretty mind blowing. So you can literally add as many sounds to one track as you want, although this gets messy quick, then after the chains add more effects like a compressor to effects all of the chains at once. I can add any other machine or vst in these chains too. I can load up a vst and create a riff, then duplicate the vst in the same track as many times as I want adding effects to each chain individually to fatten and layer things. Layering using the chain function in clips or audio tracks is amazing. Basically you could build a drum kit that pretty much has every drum sample in your library that can be cycled through on the fly.Īlso, with Ableton 9 there is a slice audio to new midi track which allows you to auto slice an audio file into predetermined segments (1/2,1/4,1/16,1/32) notes which then puts each slice into a drum rack where you can play each slice on the piano roll or with your controller/keyboard which you can then map reverse/loop points to. For instance I can have 128 different kick drums that can be cycled through on the fly with a twist of a knob, which is on only 1 sample slot out of 128 slots. There is nothing like having a drum rack that allows 128 samples where in each sample slot you can set up what are known as 128's which can you can midi map a sample select knob to. The one area that cubase has a leg up is key/midi customization. If you like the sound of MuLab, it's worth trying the free version, but most musos would be better off with a more professional DAW, like the cheaper and far slicker Reaper.Yeah Ableton is pricey but worth it imo. We can absolutely appreciate that MuLab has its fans, thanks to its unorthodox approach and modular architecture, but for music production, it's hard to recommend over more rounded and capable rivals. The improvements for v5 indicate that things are moving in this direction, so hopefully this will continue. ![]() The software is not "broken" in a fundamental way, but a rethink of some facets of the interface and the implementation of standard DAW paradigms where appropriate (eg, record arming) is needed to bring it into line with modern expectations. On the plus side, MuLab seems stable, and there are neat touches like the adjustable pre/ post fader point. ![]() Even when you do, the interface feels idiosyncratic and long-winded alongside other DAWs, lacking much of the functionality we've come to expect. From the garish, chunky interface to the reliance on menus, it's an effort to get to grips with. Our overriding impression of MuLab 5 is that it feels like a product of another, simpler era. And there's no plugin delay compensation, which is forgiveable given the price, but without a simple track delay offset, you can't easily apply manual correction. Setting up to record audio is fiddly, involving a settings page rather than the one-click 'arm track' approach of other DAWs. "Our overriding impression of MuLab 5 is that it feels like a product of another, simpler era" You can't type in values for things like fader levels either. The default key assignments are lacking - for instance, you can't transpose MIDI via the usual method of selecting notes and using the up/ down cursor keys, and to access typical MIDI functions, you have to use the right-click menu's submenus (which have to be re-opened with a click each and every time).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |